Simranjeet Singh Mann v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Civil Writ Petition No.3560 of 2014 (O&M)
DATE OF DECI SI ON: 26.02.2014
Simranjit Singh Mann
…..Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTI CE SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI
Present: Mr. Ashu Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner
SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE : (Oral)
We are not inclined to entertain the present petition as the larger issue is already before us in CWP No.20359 of 2013. In fact, in an almost identical endeavour in CWP No.825 of 2014 as also CWP No.12 of 2014, both taken up on 20.1.2014, we had refused to entertain those petitions and, in fact, those petitions stood withdrawn with liberty to the counsels to assist the Court if they seek to point out any specific aspect.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, thus, states that he also would seek to withdraw the petition and if there is any special aspect which he would like to point out, he will do so in the already pending petition where investigation is being monitored.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL ) CHI EF JUSTI CE
26.02.2014 ( ARUN PALLI ) parkash* JUDGE
Chand Parkash 2014.02.26 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Simranjit Singh Mann
State of Punjab
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court