The petitioner withdrew the writ petition stating that reliance would be placed on civil remedies regarding property and school functioning issues.
Liberty granted to the petitioner to pursue civil remedy; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Civil Writ Petition No.3087 of 2014 (O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 19.02.2014
Satnam Singh
…..Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTI CE SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI
Present: Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate for the petitioner
SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE : (Oral)
After som e arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition and states that the petitioner would take recourse to civil remedy as the right to enjoyment of his property as also the functioning of the school is affected.
Liberty granted.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL ) CHI EF JUSTI CE
19.02.2014 ( ARUN PALLI ) parkash* JUDGE
Chand Parkash 2014.02.19 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Satnam Singh
State of Punjab
Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
