Petitioner admitted arguments, obstructing substantive review. Court granted liberty to reopen the matter via proper channels and withdrew the writ petition.
Writ petition withdrawn with liberty to approach the authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.24104 of 2014 Date of Decision: November 26, 2014
Phool Singh
.....Petitioner
versus
Union of India and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH.
Present: Mr.Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate, for the petitioners.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
After arguing the case for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks and is permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the authorities.
Ordered accordingly.
[SURYA KANT]
November 26, 2014 [RAJ MOHAN SINGH] Mohinder JUDGE
MOHINDER KUMAR 2014.11.27 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Phool Singh
Union of India
Surya Kant
Raj Mohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
