The petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to challenge an order cancelling their Letter of Intent. The court allowed the civil miscellaneous application and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
C.M. application allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SATYAWAN IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 2014.10.27 16:33I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CHANDIGARH High Court Chandigarh
C.M. No. 12572 of 2014 in CWP No. 19364 of 2014 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 27.10.2014
Eco Tech Coal Industries Pvt. Ltd.
.......... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & another
...... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present : Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner.
ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, ACJ. (Oral)
Counsel for the applicant-petitioner states that he wants to withdraw the the writ petition with liberty to challenge the order dated 12.09.2014 whereby the LOI issued to the petitioner for Panipat Unit-I has been ordered to be cancelled.
Civil miscellaneous application is allowed.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as
prayed for.
(ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE
27.10.2014
sp
Eco Tech Coal Industries Pvt. Ltd.
State of Haryana
another
Ashutosh Mohunta
Anupinder Singh Grewal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
