State of Haryana v. Subhash Chander & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
A one-line order with pseudonym release refers the case to CV No. 14785 of 2013 without providing substance.
A one-line order with pseudonym release refers the case to CV No. 14785 of 2013 without providing substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Writ Petition No. 14788 of 2013
Date of Decision: 03.11.2014
Haryana State
... Petitioner
Versus
Subhash Chander and Another
... Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta.
Present: Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Punchhi, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Rajan Gupta, J.
For orders, see Civil Writ Petition No. 14785 of 2013 titled as
“Haryana State v. Ramkaran and Another” of even date.
(Rajan Gupta) Judge
November 03, 2014 “DK”
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2014.11.04 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Haryana State
Subhash Chander
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court