The Single Judge referred to a previous batch judgment (C.W.P. No.10398 of 1991) decided on 19.01.2012 involving the same petitioner and facts. The court disposed of the writ petition on the same lines as the earlier order.
The impugned order set aside and the matter remitted to the Assistant Collector for expeditious adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
C.W.P. No.13855 of 1991
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.13855 of 1991 Date of Decision.13.05.2014
Smt. Sumitra d/o Sh. Dhup Singh
......Petitioner
Versus
The Financial Commissioner, Haryana and others ......Respondents
Present: Mr. Govind Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kartar Singh, DAG, Haryana.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
-.-
K. KANNAN J.(ORAL)
Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.05.15 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
-2-
C.W.P. No.13855 of 1991
possible. If the decision has already been taken pursuant to the direction given on 19.01.2012 in the batch of writ petition referred to above, the Authority shall also examine the relevance of the said judgment and the adjudication made in the said case for determination of rights of parties in this case as well. If the decision has not been taken in the said batch, all the cases will be decided together simultaneously to secure a homogenous approach to the respective contentions of parties.
(K. KANNAN) JUDGE
May 13, 2014 Pankaj*
Kamboj Pankaj Kumar 2014.05.15 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be decided on the same lines and reasoning as in a previous batch of cases involving the same petitioner and facts.
Whether the impugned order should be set aside and the matter remitted to the Assistant Collector for adjudication.
Smt. Sumitra d/o Sh. Dhup Singh
The Financial Commissioner, Haryana
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
K. Kannan
Parties & counsel
