Petitioner filed CWP in 1993. As the matter remained pending for eleven years and impugned orders were implemented without stay, the present CWP was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.13352 of 1993 Date of decision: 03.07.2014
Sukhminder Singh
....Petitioner
Versus
The Superintending Canal Officer, Patiala Circle and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since there was
no stay, impugned orders appear to have been implemented as the matter
remained pending in this Court for about eleven years.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(Paramjeet Singh) Judge
July 03, 2014 R.S.
Singh Ravinder 2014.07.05 08:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Sukhminder Singh
The Superintending Canal Officer, Patiala Circle and others
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
