Disposed

Shamo @ Samo Devi and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC26 Aug 2014CWP/11577/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the present writ petition by holding that it is covered by the decision in a connected matter (CWP No.5737 of 2014), which directed the respondent to determine claims for solatium and interest under the Land Acquisition Act.

What did the court decide?

The petition was disposed of by relying on the directions in a connected matter (CWP No.5737 of 2014) requiring the respondent to determine claims for solatium and interest.

Shamo @ Samo Devi and Ors. Vs Union of India and… — Land Acquisition | Punjab & Haryana HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Civil Writ Petition No.11577of2014(O&M)
 DATE OF DECISION: 26.08.2014

¶3

Smt. Shamo @ Samo Devi and others

¶4

…..Petitioners

¶5

versus

¶6

Union of India and others

¶7

 .....Respondents

¶8

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEASHUTOSH MOHUNTA,ACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU

¶9

Present: Mr. Rohiteshwar Singh, Advocate for the petitioners

¶10

ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral):

¶11

Notice of motion.

¶12

 Ms. Jarnail Kaur Dhaliwal, Advocate for accepts notice

¶13

for Union of India while Mr. Sunil Sahore, Advocate, puts in
appearance on behalf of National Highways Authority of India.

¶14

 Learned counsel for the parties submit that this

¶15

petition is covered by the decision of this Court in CWP No.5737
of 2014 titled as Pawan Kumar vs. Union of India and othersand

¶16

connected matters disposed of on 26.3.2014 with the following
directions:-

¶17

“9] The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of
with a direction to respondent No.3 that let these
petitions be treated as applications on behalf of the
petitioners under Sections 23 and 28 of the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894 read with National Highways
Act, 1956 and their claim regarding grant of solatium
and interest be determined within a period of three

¶18

Chand Parkash 2014.08.26 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

CWP-11577-2014

¶20

- 2 -

¶21

months from the date of receiving a certified copy of
this order. The amount found due shall then be
released by respondent Nos.1 & 2 within a period of
one month thereafter.”

¶22

This petition also stands disposed of in terms of

¶23

the directions passed in CWP No.5737 of 2014.

¶24

 (ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA)
 ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶25

26.08.2014 (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU)
parkash*JUDGE

¶26

Chand Parkash 2014.08.26 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Shamo @ Samo Devi and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shamo @ Samo Devi and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narinder Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ramandeep Singh Vs State of Punjab &B Anr.

Ashok Kumar & Ors. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Dav College Trust and Management Society &Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Ramesh Chander Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Phuman Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.