CWP rendered infructuous as relief orders were complied with; disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.1129 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.05.2014
Satish Kumar & Anr. . . . . Petitioners
VS.
HUDA & Ors. . . . . Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Ms. Anita Balyan, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. Ajay Nara, Advocate for HUDA
SURYA KANT, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the orders have
been complied with, rendering this writ petition as infructuous.
Disposed of accordingly.
������������� ������
�����������
��������������
������������ ������
Vishal V 2014.05.23 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Satish Kumar & Anr.
HUDA & Ors.
Surya Kant
Lisa Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
