The High Court directed the respondent to reply to the petitioner's representation within one week before disposing of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH
Civil Writ Petition No.1082 of 2014 (O&M) DATE OF DECI SI ON: 22.01.2014
AFP Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd.
…..Petitioner
versus
The State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTI CE SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE HON’BLE MR. JUSTI CE ARUN PALLI
Present: Mr. Alok Jain, Advocate for the petitioner
SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL, CHI EF JUSTI CE : (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in response to the representation dated 6.12.2013 (Annexure P-4), a reply dated 13.12.2013 (Annexure P-5) was sent. It does not deal with any of the issues raised in Annexure P-4.
We, thus, direct the respondent No.3 to reply to the representation dated 6.12.2013 (Annexure P-4) dealing with the issues raised therein within a maximum period of one week of the receipt of this order.
The petition accordingly stands disposed of.
Copy dasti under signatures of Bench Secretary.
( SANJAY KI SHAN KAUL ) CHI EF JUSTI CE
22.01.2014 ( ARUN PALLI ) parkash* JUDGE
Chand Parkash 2014.01.22 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Government of Haryana shall reply to the petitioner's representation raising specific issues.
AFP Manufacturing Co. Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Haryana and others
Sanjay Ki Shan Kaul
Arun Palli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
