Petitioner sought to withdraw an order allowing him to file a fresh petition due to unreadable annexures in the underlying case.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 10086 of 2014 Date of decision: 22.05.2014
Balbir Singh Kalra
...Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr. Lekh Raj Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. (Oral)
Counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition
and wishes to withdraw the same with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action, in view of the Annexures which are not readable.
Ordered accordingly.
22.05.2014 (G.S. SANDHAWALIA) shivani JUDGE
Gupta Shivani 2014.05.24 16:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Balbir Singh Kalra
State of Haryana
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
