The petition in Criminal Revision was dismissed on the ground that the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Revision No.3407 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 31, 2014.
Bikramjeet Singh @ Vikramjeet Singh
..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
Ashok Kumar
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner (s).
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
( SURINDER GUPTA )
March 31, 2014.
JUDGE
Sachin M.
Mehta Sachin 2014.04.01 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH
Bikramjeet Singh @ Vikramjeet Singh
Ashok Kumar
SURINDER GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
