After being informed by counsel that the petitioners were discharged, making the petition infructuous, the court allowed the presentation without hearing.
Allowed the petition as it had become infructuous due to the petitioners' discharge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-2724-2014(O&M) Date of Decision: December 09, 2014
M/s Dalla Pesticide & Seeds Store and another
.....Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Anurag Chopra, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr.Mikhail Kad, AAG, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has been rendered infructuous since the petitioners have been discharged.
Learned counsel for the State has not controverted the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Ordered accordingly.
December 09, 2014 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) meenu Judge
MEENU 2014.12.10 11:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh
M/s Dalla Pesticide & Seeds Store and another
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
