Karamjit Singh v. State of Punjab and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRM-M-5768-2012 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-5768-2012 (O&M)
Date of Decision: March 24, 2014
Karamjit Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. P.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S. Pannu, DAG, Punjab, for respondent No. 1.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel submits that the present petition has
been rendered infructuous since the petitioner has been discharged by the learned Trial Court.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the
statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Disposed of accordingly.
March 24, 2014 Pkapoor
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
Kapoor Prashant 2014.03.24 18:01 I attest to the accuracy of this order
Karamjit Singh
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court