Crl. Misc. No. M 5581 of 2010 was treated as withdrawn due to a settlement by compromise. The Court dismissed the petition accordingly without further elaboration.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn due to compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
-.-
Crl. Misc. No. M 5581 of 2010 Date of decision: 26.02.2014
Dr. Mahesh Goyal
........ Petitioner
Versus
Dr. Anju Goyal and others .......Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal
-.-
Present: Mr. A S Kalara, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Arshdeep Bhullar, Advocate for the respondents
-.-
Rekha Mittal, J.
Counsel for the petitioner states that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn as the matter has been settled by way of compromise.
Ordered accordingly.
(Rekha Mittal) Judge
26.02.2014
mohan
Dr. Mahesh Goyal
Dr. Anju Goyal and others
Rekha Mittal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
