Vijay Kumar v. Amir Chand & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CRM-A No.421-MA of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 04, 2014.
Vijay Kumar
..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
Amir Chand and another
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Shivroop Singh, Advocate for Mr. K.D.S. Sodhi, Advocate for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Arshdeep Singh Kler, A.A.G. Punjab.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
It has been submitted by learned State counsel that the present petition has become infructuous as respondent No.1 has since expired.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the
petition in view of submission made by learned State counsel.
Dismissed as withdrawn as rendered infructuous.
( SURINDER GUPTA )
April 04, 2014.
JUDGE
Sachin M.
Mehta Sachin 2014.04.05 14:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH
Vijay Kumar
Amir Chand
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court