The court granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-37036 of 2013 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : February 25, 2014
Shalini Gulati
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Union Territory, Chandigarh and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
Present Mr. Arvind Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioner.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
Permission is granted. The petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
February 25, 2014
p.singh
Singh Parvinder 2014.02.25 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Shalini Gulati
State of Union Territory, Chandigarh
M. JEYAPMAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
