Coram allowed a compromise application in a criminal miscellaneous petition, treating the main matter infructuous due to a settlement.
Compromise dated 12.08.2014 taken on record; main petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty to recall order granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-31121 of 2012 Date of decision : 17.09.2014
Harjeet Singh Arora
....Petitioner
versus
Suresh Gupta ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Sunil Chadha, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Rahul Bhargav, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajaivir Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
RITU BAHRI , J. (Oral)
Crl. Misc. No. 27563 of 2014
Application is allowed as prayed for
Accordingly, compromise dated 12.08.2014 is taken on record.
Main case
Learned counsel for the parties submits that the matter stands
compromised between the parties.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
The petitioner is at liberty to file an application for recall of this order, in case any difficulty arises for execution of compromise.
17.09.2014 (RITU BAHRI) G Arora JUDGE
GAURAV 2014.09.24 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Harjeet Singh Arora
Suresh Gupta
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
