Hearing a criminal miscellaneous petition where the petitioner sought to withdraw the same; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-28739 of 2011
Date of decision: January 20, 2014
Mukesh Manek
.. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and another
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surinder Gupta
Present: Mr. Manoj Khanna, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Ajay Saini, Advocate for the complainant.
Surinder Gupta, J
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he wants to
withdraw the instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
January 20, 2014 (Surinder Gupta) deepak Judge
Deepak Kumar 2014.01.20 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document which has been signed by the Hon'ble Bench High Court, Chandigarh
Mukesh Manek
State of Haryana
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
