High Court granted police protection to petitioners who produced passports and marriage certificate proving majority and marriage. Justice M. Jeyapaul directed the Senior Superintendent of Police to provide security to the women.
Director Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot to give proper police protection to the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-2826 of 2014 DATE OF DECISION : January 24, 2014
Smt. Gurmeet Kaur and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
Present Mr. S.K. Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Heard the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.
The copies of the passports and marriage certificate produced by the petitioners would go to show that they have attained majority and they have got married. They apprehend danger to their life. Therefore, respondent no.2 Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot is directed to give proper police protection to the petitioners.
The petition is disposed of accordingly.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
January 24, 2014 p.singh
Singh Parvinder 2014.01.24 16:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to police protection due to apprehended danger to their life in the absence of the passport sealing order.
Smt. Gurmeet Kaur and another
State of Punjab and others
M. Jeyapaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
