Infructuous criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed without substantive decision due to lack of active content. Petitioner counsel did not submit further grounds requiring adjudication on merits. The order acknowledges the petition's status as infructuous and disposes of it accordingly.
Petition rendered infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc.-M No. 24978 of 2013 Date of Decision: 21.11.2014.
Ganda Singh
.......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Mayank Mathur, Advocate for Mr. P.K.Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. V.P.S.Sidhu, AAG, Punjab.
None for respondents No. 2 and 3.
Mr. Parshant Bansal, Advocate for Mr. S.S.Sarwara, Advocate for respondent No. 4.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that
this petition has been rendered infructous and is disposed of accordingly.
(SABINA) JUDGE
November 21, 2014 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2014.11.25 15:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Ganda Singh
State of Punjab
others
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
