In compliance with an order dated 11.11.2014, the trial court reported that charges were framed afresh after hearing parties on the FSL report. Consequently, the present miscellaneous petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-24690 of 2014 Date of decision: 11.12.2014.
Vikas @ Vicky
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?
2. To be referred to reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. H.N.S. Gill, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Moudgil, Addl. A.G. Haryana for the respondent – State.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
In compliance of order passed by this Court on
11.11.2014, the report has been sent by the trial Court wherein it has
been intimated that after having copies of FSL report, the parties were heard and charges were framed afresh.
In view of above, the petition is disposed of accordingly.
11.12.2014 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE
NEETU RANI 2014.12.12 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Vikas @ Vicky
State of Haryana
Daya Chaudhary
Neetu Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
