The High Court made absolute an interim bail order for two petitioners who had appeared before the trial court, allowing them to remain on bail subject to continuing appearances.
Interim order dated 23.7.2014 made absolute; petitioners granted bail on existing bonds subject to future appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Cr.Misc. M 24526 of 2014 Date of decision:- 17.10.2014
Mohindo & anr
Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab and anr
Respondent
Present: Mr. Deepak Verma, Advocate. Mr. CS Brar, DAG, Punjab Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
In view of the fact that the petitioners having already put in appearance before the trial court, the petition is allowed and interim order dated 23.7.2014 is hereby made absolute. The petitioner will remain on bail against the bail bonds already furnished subject to the condition that they will continue to appear before the trial court and will not absent themselves
without any sufficient cause.
October 17 ,2014 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE
TAPINDER SINGH MANN 2014.10.17 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim bail order should be made absolute given the petitioners' appearance in the trial court.
Mohindo & anr
State of Punjab and anr
M.M.S.Bedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
