High Court judge, M.M.S. Bedi, disposed of a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed by Mohinder Singh, holding it rendered infructuous as the FIR was examined and deemed to have no substance.
The petition was disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-18509-2013 (O&M). Decided on: February 7, 2014.
Mohinder Singh
..... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI
PRESENT Mr.M.S.Kang, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Premjit Singh Hundal, AAG., Punjab.
Mr.R.S.Pandher, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
M.M.S. BEDI, J (ORAL).
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., for a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the complaint Annexure P3, dated 25.5.2010.
State counsel, on the instructions of ASI Balbir Singh informs that the complaint Annexure P3 has been looked into and finding no substance in the same stands filed.
In view of said circumstance, this petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
(M.M.S. BEDI) February 7, 2014. JUDGE rka
Raj Kumar Arora 2014.02.11 12:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant protection under CrPC Section 482 against proceedings initiated against the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohinder Singh
State of Punjab
M.M.S. BEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
