The petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the petitioners' request to enable them to seek quashing of the FIR on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc.-M-16602 of 2014 Date of Decision: 18.12.2014.
Sumit alias Sonu and another
.......Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. K.S.Aulakh, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 3.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that
he may be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the
petitioners to seek quashing of the FIR on merits.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(SABINA) JUDGE
December 18, 2014 Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH 2014.12.18 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Sumit alias Sonu and another
State of Punjab and others
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
