This order directed police protection for petitioners fearing danger from respondent No. 5 to 8 upon proving majority and marriage, and disposed of the petition.
Respondent No. 3, Superintendent of Police, Sangrur, directed to give proper police protection to petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M- 16480 of 2014 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : May 15, 2014
Maahi Khan @ Mandeep Kaur and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
Present Mr. Mukesh Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Heard the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.
The 1st petitioner has produced copy of Matriculation Examination Certificate and the 2nd petitioner has produced copy of voter identity card to show that they have attained majority. The marriage certificate produced by the petitioners would go to show that they have got married. They apprehend danger to their life at the hands of respondents no. 5 to 8. Therefore, respondent no.3 Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur is directed to give proper police protection to the petitioners.
The petition is disposed of accordingly.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
May 15, 2014
p.singh
Singh Parvinder 2014.05.15 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Maahi Khan @ Mandeep Kaur and another
State of Punjab and others
M. Jeyapaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
