A petition under Criminal Misc. No. M-16166 of 2014 where petitioners, having attained majority via marriage, sought police protection from respondents 4 to 6 due to apprehension of danger to life.
Petitioner directed to produce proper police protection to the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M- 16166 of 2014 DATE OF DECISION : May 12, 2014
Latika Rajput and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
Present Mr. Ram Kumar Saini, Advocate for the petitioners.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
Heard the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.
The petitioners have produced copies of matriculation certificates to show that they have attained majority. The marriage certificate produced by the petitioners would go to show that they have got married. They apprehend danger to their life at the hands of respondents no. 4 to 6. Therefore, respondent no.2 Superintendent of Police, Karnal is directed to give proper police protection to the petitioners.
The petition is disposed of accordingly.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
May 12, 2014
p.singh
Singh Parvinder 2014.05.12 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to police protection given their apprehension of danger to life.
Latika Rajput
another
State of Haryana
no. 2 Superintendent of Police, Karnal
no. 4 to 6
M. Jeyapaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
