Petitioner did not appear before the High Court on the last date or any other date. The Court indicated the petitioner was not interested and dismissed the petition on grounds of non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.M-15629 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 24, 2014.
Gurmel Singh
..........PETITIONER(s).
VERSUS
State of Punjab and others
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: None for the petitioner.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
None has appeared for the petitioner. Even on the last date,
none appeared for the petitioner. Therefore, petitioner appears to be not
interested in pursuing this petition.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( SURINDER GUPTA )
July 24, 2014.
JUDGE
Sachin M.
Mehta Sachin 2014.07.24 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH
Gurmel Singh
State of Punjab
SURINDER GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
