Petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous petition regarding prosecution examination. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated the petition was not pressed at this stage following the State's submission. The matter was disposed of accordingly without a substantive decision or legal reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-15539 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 04, 2014
Avtar Singh
.....Petitioner
v.
State of Punjab
......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.Jaspal Singh Pannu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.Shilesh Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.
Mr.P.B.S.Goraya, Advocate for the complainant.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Tajinder Singh of Police Station Khalchian, District Amritsar, submits that only six police officials remained to be examined by the prosecution.
In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner
does not press this petition, at this stage.
Disposed of accordingly.
August 04, 2014 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE
Meenu 2014.08.06 17:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
Avtar Singh
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
