The petition was disposed of as infructuous because the petitioners had already been acquitted by the court below.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-15471 of 2014 Date of Decision: December 16, 2014
Jaspal & Anr.
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Ms.Neelam Chaudhary, Advocate, for Mr.Divjyot S.Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr.Shilesh Gupta, AAG, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC
Major Singh, Police Station, City, District Kapurthala, submits that the petitioners have since been acquitted by learned court below, therefore, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has
also endorsed to the above statement.
Disposed of as having become infructuous.
December 16, 2014 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge
SEEMA RANI 2014.12.16 14:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Jaspal & Anr.
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
