This judgment allows a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The High Court, on an oral hearing, observed a compromise between the parties and held nothing survived, quashing the FIR under sections 323, 324, 326 and 452 IPC.
Quashing of First information Report No.284 dated 23.05.2008 and consequential proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc.No.M-13653 of 2014 DATE OF DECISION: May 27, 2014
Raju & Anr.
.....PETITIONERS
VERSUS
State of Punjab & Ors.
.....RESPONDENTS
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL.
1.Whether the judgement should be reported in the digest? Yes/No
PRESENT:MS.G.K.MANN,ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONERS.
MR.S.S.CHAUDHARY, DEPUTY ADVOCATE GENERAL, PUNJAB.
MR.RANDEEP S. KHIRA, ADVOCATE, FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 & 3.
-*-
M.JEYAPAUL, J.(ORAL)
Sharma Seema 2014.05.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
the complainant and learned State counsel.
May 27, 2014 seema
(M.JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
Sharma Seema 2014.05.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Sharma Seema 2014.05.28 16:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash the First information Report and consequential proceedings upon effective compromise between parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raju & Anr.
State of Punjab & Ors.
M.Jeypaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
