Dismissed
Cancelled No. v. Cancelled No.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRA-S/682/2000
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRA-S-682-SB-2000 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRA-S-682-SB-2000 (O&M)
Date of Decision: January 9, 2014
Ghan Sham
…Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab
…Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Sandeep Chhabra, DAG, Punjab, for the respondent.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J
| Offence | Sentence (R.I.) | Fine | In default (R.I.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 363, IPC | Three years | `500/- | One month |
| 366, IPC | Four years | `1,000/- | Two months |
| 376, IPC | Seven years | `1,500- | Three months |
All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
CRA-S-682-SB-2000 (O&M) 2
undergone his entire sentence after availing the remissions granted by the Government and the jail authorities and was released on 12.11.2001 from the jail. After filing of the appeal, no one had appeared for the appellant.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
January 9, 2014 PKapoor
Kapoor Prashant 2014.01.14 17:49 I attest to the accuracy of this order
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against conviction and sentence requires dismissal since the appellant has already served and completed his sentence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ghan Sham
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court