Single-para order allowing Criminal Appeal based on reasoning in a separate judgment. No substantive facts or legal principles stated in this order.
Criminal appeal allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Criminal Appeal No.S-2637-SB of 2010
Date of decision:29.10.2014
Sukhchain Singh
...Appellant
v.
State of Punjab
...Respondent
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh
.....
Present: Mr. Durga Dutt Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. A.S. Klar, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.
Inderjit Singh, J.
The criminal appeal is allowed. For reasons, see separate
detailed judgment passed in Criminal Appeal No.S-3035-SB of 2010, Harjinder Singh v. State of Punjab.
October 29, 2014. (Inderjit Singh) Judge hsp
HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2014.12.18 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Harjinder Singh v. State of PunjabFollowed¶15
Harjinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Sukhchain Singh
State of Punjab
Inderjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
