This brief order notes that the appellant has completed the awarded sentence and been released. The Court accepts the argument that the appeal is now infructuous.
The appeal is dismissed as it has become infructuous due to completion of sentence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CRA-S-1931-SB of 2008 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 05, 2014.
Jagir Singh
..........APPELLANT(s).
VERSUS
State of Punjab
........RESPONDENT(s).
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA
Present: Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the appellant (s).
Mr. Varun Sharma, Asstt A.G., Punjab.
SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Learned State counsel has produced the custody certificate of the appellant, as per which the appellant has already undergone the awarded sentence and has been released on 20.11.2012.
Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that as the appellant has already undergone the sentence awarded in this case, he does not want to press this appeal and requests that the same be dismissed as infructuous.
Ordered accordingly.
( SURINDER GUPTA ) March 05, 2014. JUDGE
Sachin M.
Mehta Sachin 2014.03.05 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH
Jagir Singh
State of Punjab
Surinder Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
