Concurs with the detailed order in a separate judgment (CRA-S-656-SB of 2011) and directs the same be followed in the present case.
Appeal allowed in accordance with the separate order passed in CRA-S-656-SB of 2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRA-S-132-SB of 2011 DATE OF DECISION : November 25, 2014
Major
...Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JEYAPAUL
Present :- Mr. Jasjot Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Dhruv Dayal, DAG, Haryana.
M.JEYAPAUL, J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed in CRA-S-656-SB of 2011 Sahida Vs. State of Haryana.
(M. JEYAPAUL) JUDGE
November 25, 2014
p.singh
PARVINDER SINGH 2014.11.29 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sahida Vs. State of HaryanaReferred¶13
CRA-S-656-SB of 2011 Sahida Vs. State of Haryana
Major ...
State of Haryana
M.JEYAPAUL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M.JEYAPAUL
Parties & counsel
