call defendant witness for further examination in rebuttal nor he can summon the defendant, who is party, as a witness in this case. The argument of learned counsel for the respondent has merit. Plaintiff of course, can lead evidence in rebuttal on the issue on which the onus was on the defendant, however, plaintiff has no right to compel the defendant to come as witness nor he can call him for further crossexamination. Otherwise also, it is for the trial Court to see which evidence the plaintiff can lead in rebuttal on this issue and which evidence the plaintiff should have produced in affirmative. The next argument of learned counsel for the respondent is that plaintiff has not reserved right to lead evidence in rebuttal specifically, therefore, he cannot be allowed to lead rebuttal evidence. On this point, learned counsel for the plaintiff/petitioner argued that counsel for the plaintiff before lower Court closed the evidence in affirmative in which it imply that rebuttal evidence may well be led. Learned counsel for the plaintiff has relied upon judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in Smt.Jaswant Kaur and another vs. Devinder Singh and others, AIR 1983 Punjab and Haryana 210 , in which it is held as
