J.C. Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Kay Bouvet Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC20 May 2014CR/651/2012

Download

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

#1# IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT…

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

J.C. Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Kay Bouvet Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. — Punjab & Haryana HC (2014) — LawSathi Research

¶20

��+��.��#�&8�%&97��0�� .�� 8�%5�"(:�� %�%:�"##7�� 5�8�"''%�� 0�� 0�� +�� ;�.��.�� $��0��0��.�� (8�8�"''%�� 0��+�� . �� ;��.��(:�(#'7�� .�� .��<�� 8'�%�"''%�� .�� +��.�� .�� ;��<��.�� 0�� +�� 0��;��3�� .�� .�� #�&�"'('��1��# �� ((�$�$��2�� +�� 1�� .��"%�&�"'('�)��("�0�� <�� "%�&�"'('�)��("��+�� $�� /��(#5��"9�('�"'('�� ,��-�.��/��0��0��3�� +��.��0��0� ��"'�5�"'((��6��0��+�� 0�� "5�('�"'('�)��(8*�.��+�� "%�&�"'('�)��("* 0��.�� 0�� .�3�� .�� <�� .��"�((�"'((�)�� (%*�

¶29

��7��0�� "��)"��$�$��2�� 1��#�� ((�$�$��.�� +�� &9�$�$��.�� <�� +�� &9�$�$�� 0��0��.��"'�5�"'((�� .�� >��"�((�"'((�)��(%�� .��0��0�� "%�&�"'('�)��("*�0�� +��.�� +�� ;�� .��.� ��0�� + ��0��0��+��+�$��

¶47

<�� &9��$�$�� .�� ('% ��0��.��.� ��;��+�� $�� $��0��<�� +�� 1� +�� ('%)()����)����)�)��A�)���0��1��%8�$�$��.��+��(: �� ('5�� .��+��.��+��$�� ;�� 2�� +��.� ��('%��1��%8�$�$� <�� 6�� ('%)"�� .�� 0��(''�$�$�� B��$��.��+�� +��+�$�� <��.��0�� ")"�� " )(%*�� B��$��0�� ('' $�$�� .�� <�� 0�� 0�+� �� 6��$�� .�� .��+�� ('5��0�� +��+

¶74

<�� 0�� 0�� +��$��.�+�� 2�� $��<��0��2��0�� ('�� $�� $��0��;�� 4��$�� .�+�� $��1��#�� ('��.��0��$��;�� $��0�� ?�� .�� 0��.�+�� $��+��$��0�� +��$��;�� $��3��;��.�+��

¶96

��2�� 0��.�� 1��# �� (( �)��)��)�* ��)�* ��$�� $�� 2��0�� 1��# �� ((��<�� )�* �A �)�* �� + �� .��+��..�� 0��.��+��+�0�� +��+� �0��<�� 0�� 0��2��$�� $��;�� +�� +��.� ��0��$�$� �� ((�$�$�0��+��2��+ �� D�� .��+��B��$��)�*�� (""��("5��$�� $��6��+ ��1��#�� ((��(%:��(%&��$�$� ��$�� .�� .��+��+ ��+��.��.�+��+��$�� +��3��.��

¶101

6��.��+�� &9��$�� + ��0�� 2��.��$��.�� $��2�� +�� .�� 1��#�� ((��6��0�� .��;�� (8��1��#��2�� 0� �� .�� .� ��2��0�� 0�� .�� 2��2��6��2��+�� .�+�.��$��.��+�� +��1��#�� ((�)���)���)���)��� 3��0�� .��.��

¶106

� �� +�0�+��.�� <�� +��('%)()��0��1��%8)()� ��.�� +�0��@� ��1��# �� ('F��;��0�� ('��1��#�0�� 0��D�� +��2��.��$��2�� 85��&(��&"��&5��&%)��� 0��('%)���.�� 0�� 0�� 2�� 1��#�� ((��<��2��.��2�� 4�� + �0�+ ��.�� + �� .� ��('%��0��1��%8�� + �� &9�

¶109

* 8��!��!��!� ��$��"�� $��:��(��$��8��;�� ! � ��!��!�� !��#��!!�� "��!� ��$ 8�� "�� #��!��! ��!�� $��8�� "�� /��+�� #��/��-��#��! ��1�� !!��!��!��"��"�� $��8�� "��$��8��"��$��8�� !��!��2��:��:�� "�� !!$��"�� "�� $��.��/�� !��"�5�

¶118

*9$ 8��! ��/��<��=�� !!��"��!�� !!��!�� !! �!��#��!��"�� !��"��!��!!=��!�� !�� !��!��!��!�� !��!!�"�� #��$��"��"�� "��!!�� !��!��!�� !��$��.�#��"��!�� !��$��>��!��#�� #��"�� "��$��"�� "��,��?� .��!��!��!��!�� #��!�� !��#��!�� !�� !��$��/� �� /��=��"��"�� !��!�� "��!��"�� #�� $��8�� "��!�� "�� /��$��,�� !�� !�� #��!�� !��$��/�� "��!��"$��8�� !!��"��" ��"��4��=�� @� �� =��$�� !�� "��!��1��A��!��B��:�� /��=�� !��1��A�� !��@��:��/�� <��=��$��/��! �� 8�� "�� !!��!�� #��"��!��/��9��!�� #�� $��,�

J.C. Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Kay Bouvet Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

J.C. Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Kay Bouvet Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Case details

Similar cases

Esys Information Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Microsoft Regional Sales Corporation and Ors.

Ranjit Kaur Vs Dharminder Singh

Kuldip Singh Vs Tirath Singh and Ors.

Resurgence India Vs Union of India

Dheeraj Pratap Sirohi Vs State of Haryana & Anr.

Madan Pal Tyagi Vs H.V.P.N.L. & Ors.