The single judge disposed of a pending Cr. No. 3425 of 1991 when counsel did not appear, ordering it deleted from the list with liberty to approach the court if any cause survives.
Case treated as disposed and deleted from the list of pending cases with liberty to make an application with complete record if any cause survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.3425 of 1991 (O&M)
Date of decision: 08.05.2014
M.C. ... Petitioner
VERSUS
Darshana ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Present: None for the parties
RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J.
The learned counsel whose names are indicated in the list have
not turned up.
There is no intimation about the status of the case.
In the considered view of this Court, no purpose will be served by keeping the present case pending. This case is ordered to be treated as a case disposed of and deleted from the list of pending cases. Liberty is given to the parties to make an appropriate application along with the complete record of the case if there is any surviving cause.
(RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) 08.05.2014 JUDGE manju
Mittal Manju 2014.05.12 12:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
M.C.
Darshana
Rajiv Narain Raina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
