The High Court of Punjab and Haryana treated a case as disposed of and deleted it from the pending list due to the absence of counsel and lack of intimation on case status.
case treated as disposed and deleted from the list of pending cases.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No.3158 of 1994 (O&M)
Date of decision: 12.05.2014
Kuldip Singh ... Petitioner
VERSUS
Joginder Kaur ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Present: None for the parties.
RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J.
The learned counsel whose names are indicated in the list have not turned up.
There is no intimation about the status of the case.
In the considered view of this Court, no purpose will be served by keeping the present case pending. This case is ordered to be treated as a case disposed of and deleted from the list of pending cases. Liberty is given to the parties to make an appropriate application along with the complete record of the case if there is any surviving cause.
12.05.2014 manju
(RAJIV NARAIN RAINA) JUDGE
Mittal Manju 2014.05.13 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Kuldip Singh
Joginder Kaur
RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
