Dismissed

(O&M)Parmod Kumar v. Prit Pal Sharma @ Prithi Pal Sharma

Punjab & Haryana HC22 Jan 2014CR/2684/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This revision petition seeking ejectment was dismissed without entertaining arguments on merits. The petitioner was granted nine months to vacate the premises from the present date, subject to filing an undertaking with the Rent Controller and clearing all pending rent arrears within the stipulated period. The order operates subject to these conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted nine months to vacate the premises, subject to undertaking payment of arrears and rent to respondent.

(O&M)Parmod Kumar Vs Prit Pal Sharma @ Prithi… — Landlord and Tenant | Punjab & Haryana HC (2014)

¶1

Civil Revision No. 2684 of 2009 (O&M)

¶2

-1-

¶3

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

¶4

Civil Revision No. 2684 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: 22.1.2014.

Parmod Kumar

.......Petitioner

Versus

Prit Pal Sharma alias Prithi Pal Sharma

¶9

.......Respondent

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

¶11

Present: Mr. R.P.Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr. Hari Om Sharma, Advocate for the respondent. ****

¶13

SABINA, J.

¶14

Respondent had filed the petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 seeking ejectment of the petitioner. The learned Rent Controller vide order dated 27.11.2008 allowed the ejectment petition. The said judgment was upheld by the Appellate Authority vide judgment dated 18.3.2009. Hence, the present petition by the petitionertenant.

¶15

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not press the revision petition on merits and prayed that the petitioner be granted nine months time to vacate the demised premises as he was in possession of the premises in question for a number of years and the shop in question was the only source of livelihood of the petitioner.

¶16

The said request has not been opposed by the learned

¶17

Singh Gurpreet 2014.01.24 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

¶18

Civil Revision No. 2684 of 2009 (O&M)

¶19

-2-

¶20

counsel for the respondent.

¶21

In view of submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this revision petition is dismissed on merits. However, the petitioner is granted nine months time from today to vacate the demised premises i.e. on or before 22.10.2014. This order shall operate subject to filing of an undertaking by the petitioner in this regard before the learned Rent Controller within 15 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and on making payment of the entire arrears of rent, if any due, within a period of 4 weeks from today and shall also keep on paying the rent of ensuing months up to 22.10.2014 to the respondent on or before 10th of each calendar month.

¶22

(SABINA) JUDGE

¶23

January 22, 2014 Gurpreet

¶24

Singh Gurpreet 2014.01.24 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh

(O&M)Parmod Kumar v. Prit Pal Sharma @ Prithi Pal Sharma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

(O&M)Parmod Kumar v. Prit Pal Sharma @ Prithi Pal Sharma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Parkash Chopra Vs Nawal Kishore Chopra

Ashok Kumar and Anr. Vs Radha Kishan and Ors.

Altaf Ur Rehman Vs Punjab Wakf Board etc.

Surinder Mahajan and Ors. Vs Ajit Sanghera

Harish Kumar and Ors. Vs Rambhaj and Ors.

Ripudaman Mittal Etfc. Vs Jaswant Singh Saggu