A civil revision petition challenging a possession order was dismissed as infructuous because the respondent took physical possession of the premises in compliance with the court order.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 2275 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.1.2014.
Karan Singh
.......Petitioner
Versus
Dr. Dhiraj Sasan
.......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Ms. Promila Nain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S.Toor, Advocate for the respondent.
SABINA, J.
Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that this petition has been rendered infructuous as possession of the demised premises has already been taken by the respondent in view of the Court order.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(SABINA) JUDGE
January 17, 2014 Gurpreet
Singh Gurpreet 2014.01.17 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh
Karan Singh
Dr. Dhiraj Sasan
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
