Suresh Jindal v. Kewal Krishan (Huf)
Case brief
What is this about?
An order referencing a prior decision; no substantive reasoning or outcome is provided in the text.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 1657 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.2.2014.
Suresh Jindal
.......Petitioner
Versus
Kewal Krishan
.......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Arun Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepak. Basatia, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Paras Talwar, Advocate for the respondent.
SABINA, J.
For orders, see Civil Revision No. 6576 of 2009.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Suresh Jindal
- respondent
Kewal Krishan
Coram
Sabina
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/1657/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court