The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the counsel informed the court they could not contact the appellant and lacked instructions. The judgment grants liberty to revive the appeal if circumstances warrant.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution; liberty is granted to move an application for revival of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
RSA No.932 of 1986 (O&M) Date of decision: 6.9.2013
Ajmer Singh
...Appellant
Versus
Jawala Singh
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. G.S. Punia, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent.
Rajan Gupta, J. (oral)
Mr. Punia submits that he has not been able to contact the appellant despite efforts. He, thus, has no instructions in the appeal.
In view of statement made by Mr. Punia, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Learned counsel shall, however, be at liberty to move an application for revival of the appeal in case there is any change of circumstances.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
6.9.2013 'rajpal'
Singh Rajpal 2013.09.06 16:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Ajmer Singh
Jawala Singh
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
