COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of appellant on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA No.428 of 1986 (O&M) Date of decision:09.07.2013
Smt. Pushpa
....Appellant
Versus
Bal Krishen and others
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Present:- None for the appellant.
Mr. Sarwan Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. N.S.Rapri, Advocate for the respondents.
RAKESH KUMAR GARG, J (ORAL)
Even on the last date of hearing, no one was present on
behalf of the appellant and the following order was passed:-
“Appeal is of the year 1986.
In the interest of justice, adjourned to 09.07.2013.
However, it is made clear that no further
adjournment would be granted on the next date of hearing.”
Today again, no one is present on behalf of the appellant.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RAKESH KUMAR GARG) JUDGE
July 09, 2013 savita
Smt. Pushpa
Bal Krishen and others
Rakesh Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
