The High Court disposed of the review application in identical terms to a related case (RA No.174 of 2003), with counsel for both parties agreeing to this outcome.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RA No.257 of 2002 in CWP No.5548 of 2002 Date of decision: 10.05.2013
The PST Corporation S.C./B.C. Employees Fedreration
.....Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others ..... Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SARON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.BANGARH
Present: Mr. Amit Singh , Advocate for the review applicant.
Mr. R. K. Arora, Advocate for the petitioner-non-applicant.
Mr. S. S. Dhaliwal, Addl. AG, Punjab.
S.S. SARON, J.
Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the review application can be disposed of in terms of order passed today in RA No.174 of 2003 in CWP No.13487 of 2002 titled 'Balwant Rai and others versus State of Punjab and others'.
Accordingly, the review application is disposed of in the
same terms.
( S. S. Saron ) Judge
( S.P. Bangarh ) Judge
10.05.2013
A.Kaundal
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Balwant Rai and others versus State of Punjab and othersFollowed¶12
RA No.174 of 2003 in CWP No.13487 of 2002
The PST Corporation S.C./B.C. Employees Fedreration
State of Punjab and others
S.S. Saron
S.P. Bangarh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
