The Division Bench condoned delays in two letters of appeal. Following precedent, the court held that respondents entitled to pay scales from their promotion date and dismissed the appeals.
Delays condoned; appeals allowed; respondents entitled to pay scales from date of promotion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
LPA No. 586 of 2013 (O&M) LPA No. 589 of 2013 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
LPA No. 586 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision : 22.03.2013
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus
Dharambir and others
...Respondents
LPA No. 589 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision : 22.03.2013
State of Haryana and others
...Appellants
Versus
Subhash Chander
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present: Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, for the appellants.
A.K. SIKRI, C.J. (ORAL)
C.M. No. 1549 of 2013 in LPA No. 586 of 2013 & C.M. No. 1555 of 2013 in LPA No. 589 of 2013
There is a delay of 64 days in filing LPA No. 586 of 2013 and 62 days in filing LPA No. 589 of 2013.
For the reasons stated in the applications, the aforesaid delay is condoned.
Disposed of.
LPA Nos. 586 and 589 of 2013
The subject matter of these appeals is covered by judgement of this Division Bench in LPA No. 1847 of 2011 titled as
LPA No. 586 of 2013 (O&M) LPA No. 589 of 2013 (O&M)
-2-
Narinder Kumar Vs State of Haryana and others , decided on 10.12.2012. Therefore, the respondents are entitled to the pay scales, as claimed. Needless to mention, the said pay scales would be given
from the date they were promoted as T-Mates.
(A.K. SIKRI) CHIEF JUSTICE
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN) JUDGE
22.03.2013
Amodh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the letters of appeal should be condoned.
Whether the respondents are entitled to pay scales as claimed under the Narinder Kumar judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Narinder Kumar Vs State of Haryana and othersFollowed¶25
LPA No. 1847 of 2011
State of Haryana and others
Dharambir and others
Subhash Chander
A.K. SIKRI
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
