Sahabuddin v. Saveer etc.
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2012 in/and FAO No.5929 of 2011(O&M) [1]…
What did the court decide?
Appeal allowed; question of indemnity adjudicated on merits rejected; claimant deposit returned to appellant.
of 2012 in/and FAO No.5929 of 2011(O&M) [1]…
Appeal allowed; question of indemnity adjudicated on merits rejected; claimant deposit returned to appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[1]
CM No.256-CII of 2012 in/and FAO No.5929 of 2011(O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM No.256-CII of 2012 in/and FAO No.5929 of 2011(O&M) Date of Decision: 01.02.2013
Sahabuddin, son of Battan, resident of Badka, Police Station, Nuh, District Mewat.
... Applicant/Appellant
Versus
Saveer alias Sabbir son of Kalu alias Kalu Shekhi, resident of village Pingagwan, P.S. Punhana, District Mewat and others.
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN
Present:Mr. JS Hooda, Advocate
K. KANNAN, J. (Oral)
are fully satisfied by payment of the amount and the execution petition filed by the claimants has also been disposed of as such. The issue in appeal is on the entitlement of indemnity for the insurance company. However, having regard to the fact that the owner has already satisfied the driver, he would not seek for an adjudication on merits. The appeal is disposed of
[2]
CM No.256-CII of 2012 in/and FAO No.5929 of 2011(O&M)
which according to him has become infructuous. The amount which was deposited at the time of preferring the appeal is ordered to be returned to the appellant.
1st February, 2013 Rajan
( K. KANNAN ) JUDGE
Sahabuddin, son of Battan
Saveer alias Sabbir son of Kalu
K. Kannan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court