The High Court dismissed the appeal as infructuous upon finding that the respondent had expired on 20.12.2012, rendering the litigation unnecessary.
The appeal was taken on board and dismissed as infructuous due to the death of the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.M. No.3735-CII of 2013 in FAO No.M-59 of 2006 DATE OF DECISION : 15.02.2013
Dr. Sujata Sharma
...Appellant
Versus
Dr. Bachan Singh
...Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE REKHA MITTAL
Present : Mr. D.K.Singal, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. D.S.Sandhu, Advocate, for the non-applicant/respondent.
RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in this application is for withdrawal of the appeal, as
respondent has since expired.
Notice of the application to the non-applicant/respondent.
Mr. D.S.Sandhu, Advocate, accepts notice and states that he
has no instructions, in this regard.
Counsel for the applicant/appellant states that as respondent has passed away, on 20.12.2012, which is duly proved by the death certificate (Annexure A-1), the appeal has been rendered infructuous.
We have heard counsel for the applicant/appellant, perused the death certificate (Annexure A-1) and as the respondent has expired, the appeal is taken on board and is dismissed as infructuous.
(RAJIVE BHALLA) JUDGE
15.02.2013 (REKHA MITTAL) adhikari JUDGE
Dr. Sujata Sharma
Dr. Bachan Singh
RAJIVE BHALLA
REKHA MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
