This one-line order dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution when the appellant failed to deposit costs or appear on record.
None. Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
���������������������������������������� ��������������
�������������������������� !� ���������""���������
Date of decision: 22nd July, 2013
Kuldip Singh Tamber
Appellant
Versus
Gurjit Singh and others
Respondents
�����#�����$�%��������&�������'�&��'����������
Present: None.
��'�&��'���������(����)���%*
Neither the costs of Rs.1000/*, which was a condition precedent, in compliance of the order dated 30.01.2013 have been deposited nor anyone is present on behalf of the appellant.
Dismissed for non*prosecution.
�)��'�&��'���������*� ������
�+,-���(������
���
Singh Rattan Pal 2013.07.25 11:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Kuldip Singh Tamber
Gurjit Singh and others
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
