The facts and circumstances it may be noticed are that the respondent himself has claimed litigation expenses of Rs.65,000/- for the unnecessary litigation which according to him the appellant has created. The said amount mentioned by him is indicative of the fact that the parties have a good status and the respondent has means to maintain the appellant. The question regarding the appellant getting interest on the FDR of Rs.3,50,000/- , it may be noticed that in para 2 (vii) of the grounds of appeal, the appellant has mentioned that she filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 against the respondent, her father-in-law and mother-in-law as also her brother-in-law in which it was specifically stated that a huge amount of Rs.15,00,000/- had been spent on the engagement and marriage and some household articles, furniture, jewellery with cash of Rs.1,00,000/- for 'Shagun Kanyadaan' and on the wish of the respondent and his family members Rs.3,50,0000/- was given to them by way of FDR in the name of the appellant for purchasing a car. Therefore, the said amount was given according to the appellant in her name for purchasing a car and it was given to the respondent and his family members. Be that as it may, keeping in view the fact that the respondent is an advocate and has claimed Rs.65,000/towards litigation expenses, we are satisfied that he is well placed; besides,
